<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1276 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421610</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that adjustments made under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act regarding employees&#039; contributions to Provident Fund and ESI were beyond the section&#039;s scope. The Tribunal found that the additions were unjust as the payments were made before the due date for filing the return. It concluded that the Revenue&#039;s adjustments were erroneous, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 1,71,75,434. The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing that the applicability of the amendments introduced by the Finance Act 2021 was not pertinent to this decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 08:13:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1276 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421610</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that adjustments made under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act regarding employees&#039; contributions to Provident Fund and ESI were beyond the section&#039;s scope. The Tribunal found that the additions were unjust as the payments were made before the due date for filing the return. It concluded that the Revenue&#039;s adjustments were erroneous, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 1,71,75,434. The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing that the applicability of the amendments introduced by the Finance Act 2021 was not pertinent to this decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>