<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1269 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421603</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the lump sum ex-gratia payment received by the assessee should be classified as &quot;salary received in advance&quot; rather than &quot;compensation for termination of employment.&quot; Consequently, the assessee was deemed eligible for relief under Section 89(1) read with Rule 21A(2) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. The appeal was allowed, directing the Assessing Officer to grant the relief accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 08:13:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1269 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421603</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the lump sum ex-gratia payment received by the assessee should be classified as &quot;salary received in advance&quot; rather than &quot;compensation for termination of employment.&quot; Consequently, the assessee was deemed eligible for relief under Section 89(1) read with Rule 21A(2) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. The appeal was allowed, directing the Assessing Officer to grant the relief accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>