<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1256 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421590</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Appeal against the rejection of the Section 9 Application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Adjudicating Authority found the bill submitted by the Appellant to be forged and fabricated, indicating collusion between the parties. Despite the Appellant&#039;s arguments, the Tribunal upheld the Authority&#039;s decision, emphasizing the need for concrete evidence to establish collusion. Citing a previous judgment was deemed insufficient, and the Appeal was ultimately dismissed, underscoring the importance of evidence in insolvency proceedings and discouraging collusive practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 08:12:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1256 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421590</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Appeal against the rejection of the Section 9 Application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Adjudicating Authority found the bill submitted by the Appellant to be forged and fabricated, indicating collusion between the parties. Despite the Appellant&#039;s arguments, the Tribunal upheld the Authority&#039;s decision, emphasizing the need for concrete evidence to establish collusion. Citing a previous judgment was deemed insufficient, and the Appeal was ultimately dismissed, underscoring the importance of evidence in insolvency proceedings and discouraging collusive practices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>