<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1245 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421579</link>
    <description>A prosecution under the Negotiable Instruments Act may be quashed where the complainant already holds funds in escrow that can be adjusted against the cheque liability, compensation and costs, because the criminal process should not be used as a recovery device in those circumstances. The Court also emphasised that vicarious liability of directors requires specific averments showing how they were in charge of and responsible for the company&#039;s business at the relevant time; vague allegations are insufficient. On those grounds, the proceedings were quashed and adjustment from the amount lying with the respondent was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2022 21:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1245 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421579</link>
      <description>A prosecution under the Negotiable Instruments Act may be quashed where the complainant already holds funds in escrow that can be adjusted against the cheque liability, compensation and costs, because the criminal process should not be used as a recovery device in those circumstances. The Court also emphasised that vicarious liability of directors requires specific averments showing how they were in charge of and responsible for the company&#039;s business at the relevant time; vague allegations are insufficient. On those grounds, the proceedings were quashed and adjustment from the amount lying with the respondent was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>