<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1338 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301946</link>
    <description>Pay-fixation policy and wage-revision timing remain primarily within the employer&#039;s discretion, subject to limited judicial review for illegality, irrationality, procedural impropriety, arbitrariness or perversity. Financial capacity, organisational viability, committee consideration, board approval and statutory acceptance support differentiated implementation dates; a court should not substitute its preferred date. Equal pay for equal work requires substantial equivalence of duties, responsibilities, qualifications and status. Pay parity may be denied where posts involve greater supervisory functions, distinct qualifications or a separate promotional hierarchy. Revised scales from a later date and differentiated cadre pay are therefore sustainable where founded on relevant financial and administrative considerations and material differences between posts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2022 21:34:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1338 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301946</link>
      <description>Pay-fixation policy and wage-revision timing remain primarily within the employer&#039;s discretion, subject to limited judicial review for illegality, irrationality, procedural impropriety, arbitrariness or perversity. Financial capacity, organisational viability, committee consideration, board approval and statutory acceptance support differentiated implementation dates; a court should not substitute its preferred date. Equal pay for equal work requires substantial equivalence of duties, responsibilities, qualifications and status. Pay parity may be denied where posts involve greater supervisory functions, distinct qualifications or a separate promotional hierarchy. Revised scales from a later date and differentiated cadre pay are therefore sustainable where founded on relevant financial and administrative considerations and material differences between posts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>