https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301946 Pay revision based on financial stringency is generally a matter of employer policy and will be disturbed only if it is illegal, irrational, arbitrary, procedurally improper or perverse. Where the revision was supported by material, examined by a committee, approved by the board and accepted by the competent authority, judicial review should not substitute a different implementation date. The equal pay for equal work principle applies only to posts with substantially similar duties, responsibilities, qualifications and status; where cadres differ materially, parity may be refused. The article states that the employer's later effective date for revised pay scales was upheld and the claim for pay parity failed. en-us Fri, 09 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Apr 2022 21:34:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301946 Pay revision based on financial stringency is generally a matter of employer policy and will be disturbed only if it is illegal, irrational, arbitrary, procedurally improper or perverse. Where the revision was supported by material, examined by a committee, approved by the board and accepted by the competent authority, judicial review should not substitute a different implementation date. The equal pay for equal work principle applies only to posts with substantially similar duties, responsibilities, qualifications and status; where cadres differ materially, parity may be refused. The article states that the employer's later effective date for revised pay scales was upheld and the claim for pay parity failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 09 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301946