<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1629 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301941</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, holding that the treatment of Futures and Options Transactions as speculative transactions was valid. Transactions without physical delivery are considered speculative and do not contribute to turnover for audit purposes under u/s.44AB. Consequently, the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was revoked, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2022 21:34:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1629 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301941</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, holding that the treatment of Futures and Options Transactions as speculative transactions was valid. Transactions without physical delivery are considered speculative and do not contribute to turnover for audit purposes under u/s.44AB. Consequently, the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was revoked, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>