https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301953 The Supreme Court held that employees of the Water and Land Management Institute (WALMI) are not entitled to pensionary benefits on par with State Government employees. The Court emphasized WALMI's autonomy, its specific exclusion of pension benefits in its rules, and the financial implications involved. It underscored that policy decisions regarding pension benefits should be left to the discretion of the State and autonomous bodies, not subject to judicial interference. The Court set aside the High Court's directive, reinforcing the principle that courts should refrain from intervening in policy decisions, particularly those with financial repercussions. en-us Mon, 10 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Apr 2022 21:34:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301953 The Supreme Court held that employees of the Water and Land Management Institute (WALMI) are not entitled to pensionary benefits on par with State Government employees. The Court emphasized WALMI's autonomy, its specific exclusion of pension benefits in its rules, and the financial implications involved. It underscored that policy decisions regarding pension benefits should be left to the discretion of the State and autonomous bodies, not subject to judicial interference. The Court set aside the High Court's directive, reinforcing the principle that courts should refrain from intervening in policy decisions, particularly those with financial repercussions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301953