<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1337 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301936</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chennai upheld the decisions of the ld. CIT(A) regarding depreciation on transformer and additional depreciation on windmill for the assessment year 2006-07, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The court cited the requirement of operational connectivity for additional depreciation under section 32(1)(iia) and referred to precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble Madras High Court in allowing additional depreciation on the windmill cost. The judgment was pronounced on 16.12.2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2022 18:53:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1337 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301936</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chennai upheld the decisions of the ld. CIT(A) regarding depreciation on transformer and additional depreciation on windmill for the assessment year 2006-07, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The court cited the requirement of operational connectivity for additional depreciation under section 32(1)(iia) and referred to precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble Madras High Court in allowing additional depreciation on the windmill cost. The judgment was pronounced on 16.12.2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>