https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301933 Externment proceedings under the Bombay Police Act were described as requiring only notice of the general nature of the material allegations and an opportunity to explain. Earlier Supreme Court decisions had already upheld Sections 56 and 59, and the appellate scheme under Section 60, so later Article 21 arguments about fair, just and reasonable procedure were treated as insufficient to reopen their validity. The commentary states that the challenge to the externment provisions therefore failed, and the attack on the proceedings was rejected on the merits. en-us Sat, 03 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Apr 2022 16:44:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301933 Externment proceedings under the Bombay Police Act were described as requiring only notice of the general nature of the material allegations and an opportunity to explain. Earlier Supreme Court decisions had already upheld Sections 56 and 59, and the appellate scheme under Section 60, so later Article 21 arguments about fair, just and reasonable procedure were treated as insufficient to reopen their validity. The commentary states that the challenge to the externment provisions therefore failed, and the attack on the proceedings was rejected on the merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 03 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301933