https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421577 The HC allowed the writ application challenging dismissal of a CGST appeal. The petitioner, a supplier of iron and steel products, failed to make the mandatory 10% pre-deposit (Rs. 11,08,961) of the disputed tax liability due to communication issues. Recognizing the petitioner's willingness to comply, the Court directed payment of the pre-deposit within two weeks, upon which the Commissioner (Appeals) must restore the appeal for hearing on merits. The Court emphasized this order addressed only the procedural requirement without expressing any opinion on substantive aspects of the case. en-us Wed, 20 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Apr 2025 14:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421577 The HC allowed the writ application challenging dismissal of a CGST appeal. The petitioner, a supplier of iron and steel products, failed to make the mandatory 10% pre-deposit (Rs. 11,08,961) of the disputed tax liability due to communication issues. Recognizing the petitioner's willingness to comply, the Court directed payment of the pre-deposit within two weeks, upon which the Commissioner (Appeals) must restore the appeal for hearing on merits. The Court emphasized this order addressed only the procedural requirement without expressing any opinion on substantive aspects of the case. Case-Laws GST Wed, 20 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421577