https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421572 The HC dismissed a review application challenging a Division Bench order dated 05.08.2021. The applicant argued that the court failed to consider binding precedents, resulting in a legal error that warranted correction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC. The court held that merely suggesting a different conclusion might have been reached if alternative legal principles were applied was insufficient grounds for review. The HC exercised caution in examining the propriety of the original order due to the reconstitution of the bench, ultimately finding no basis to interfere with the previous decision. en-us Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jul 2026 14:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421572 The HC dismissed a review application challenging a Division Bench order dated 05.08.2021. The applicant argued that the court failed to consider binding precedents, resulting in a legal error that warranted correction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC. The court held that merely suggesting a different conclusion might have been reached if alternative legal principles were applied was insufficient grounds for review. The HC exercised caution in examining the propriety of the original order due to the reconstitution of the bench, ultimately finding no basis to interfere with the previous decision. Case-Laws GST Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421572