<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1226 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421560</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed in its entirety. The Tribunal upheld the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer, confirmed the additions of Rs. 1,38,38,000/- and Rs. 6,20,00,000/- as unexplained expenditure and investments, respectively, and dismissed the grounds related to the opportunity of being heard and credit of seized cash.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:31:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1226 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421560</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed in its entirety. The Tribunal upheld the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer, confirmed the additions of Rs. 1,38,38,000/- and Rs. 6,20,00,000/- as unexplained expenditure and investments, respectively, and dismissed the grounds related to the opportunity of being heard and credit of seized cash.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>