<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (1) TMI 11 - ORISSA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28729</link>
    <description>The High Court of Orissa upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment years 1962-63 and 1964-65. The Tribunal emphasized the burden of proof on the assessee to show no income difference due to fraud or neglect, requiring a preponderance of probabilities. Trading additions and cash introductions were deemed justified based on explanations provided by the assessee. The Tribunal highlighted the discretionary power of the taxing authority in penalty imposition, ruling in favor of the assessee due to the absence of contumacious conduct or wilful non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:30:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (1) TMI 11 - ORISSA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28729</link>
      <description>The High Court of Orissa upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment years 1962-63 and 1964-65. The Tribunal emphasized the burden of proof on the assessee to show no income difference due to fraud or neglect, requiring a preponderance of probabilities. Trading additions and cash introductions were deemed justified based on explanations provided by the assessee. The Tribunal highlighted the discretionary power of the taxing authority in penalty imposition, ruling in favor of the assessee due to the absence of contumacious conduct or wilful non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>