<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Confirms No Restriction on Arbitral Tribunal Appointment During Insolvency Proceedings u/s 7 of IBC 2016.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63115</link>
    <description>Interpretation of Statute - Appointment of Arbitral Tribunal - whether mere filing of a proceeding under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, would amount to any embargo on the Court considering an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996, to appoint an arbitral tribunal? - proceedings in rem - HELD No - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:30:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:30:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Confirms No Restriction on Arbitral Tribunal Appointment During Insolvency Proceedings u/s 7 of IBC 2016.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63115</link>
      <description>Interpretation of Statute - Appointment of Arbitral Tribunal - whether mere filing of a proceeding under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, would amount to any embargo on the Court considering an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996, to appoint an arbitral tribunal? - proceedings in rem - HELD No - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:30:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>