<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1202 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421536</link>
    <description>Section 73(4) of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 treats tax proof as the normal condition for entertaining an appeal, but its proviso allows the appellate authority to accept a lesser deposit or security for recorded reasons. That discretion must be exercised judicially on the facts of the case, and the forum should consider whether the appellant has made out a strong prima facie case before insisting on pre-deposit. A mechanical demand for a large deposit without addressing that aspect is inconsistent with the statutory scheme. The pre-deposit direction was therefore not justified, and the appeal was restored for hearing on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:29:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1202 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421536</link>
      <description>Section 73(4) of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 treats tax proof as the normal condition for entertaining an appeal, but its proviso allows the appellate authority to accept a lesser deposit or security for recorded reasons. That discretion must be exercised judicially on the facts of the case, and the forum should consider whether the appellant has made out a strong prima facie case before insisting on pre-deposit. A mechanical demand for a large deposit without addressing that aspect is inconsistent with the statutory scheme. The pre-deposit direction was therefore not justified, and the appeal was restored for hearing on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>