https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301912 The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the order of the DRP for the assessment year 2013-14. The issue revolved around the selection of a comparable company for determining the NCP margin. The Tribunal agreed with the argument that M/s. Infosys BPO, with significantly higher turnover than the assessee, was incomparable. Relying on past decisions, the Tribunal directed the exclusion of M/s. Infosys BPO for NCP margin calculation, emphasizing the importance of turnover parity in such assessments. en-us Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Apr 2022 20:32:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301912 The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the order of the DRP for the assessment year 2013-14. The issue revolved around the selection of a comparable company for determining the NCP margin. The Tribunal agreed with the argument that M/s. Infosys BPO, with significantly higher turnover than the assessee, was incomparable. Relying on past decisions, the Tribunal directed the exclusion of M/s. Infosys BPO for NCP margin calculation, emphasizing the importance of turnover parity in such assessments. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301912