<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1510 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301915</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the WTM&#039;s order with modifications, holding that the liability for disgorgement should be individual based on the profit earned by each appellant, except for one individual who was held jointly and severally liable due to a significant role in the fraudulent activities. The appeals were disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2022 20:32:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1510 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301915</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the WTM&#039;s order with modifications, holding that the liability for disgorgement should be individual based on the profit earned by each appellant, except for one individual who was held jointly and severally liable due to a significant role in the fraudulent activities. The appeals were disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>