https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301923 A challenge to an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 must be filed within three months, with only a further thirty days available on sufficient cause being shown and no extension beyond that outer limit. The Court treated Section 34(3) as mandatory and rejected reliance on a Section 37 decision because the limitation scheme for Section 34 is materially different. As the challenge was filed after the non-extendable period, the delay was not condonable and the refusal to condone it was upheld. en-us Mon, 23 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Apr 2022 20:32:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301923 A challenge to an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 must be filed within three months, with only a further thirty days available on sufficient cause being shown and no extension beyond that outer limit. The Court treated Section 34(3) as mandatory and rejected reliance on a Section 37 decision because the limitation scheme for Section 34 is materially different. As the challenge was filed after the non-extendable period, the delay was not condonable and the refusal to condone it was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 23 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301923