<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1364 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301922</link>
    <description>An appeal was dismissed for low tax effect because the Revenue conceded that the monetary threshold under CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 was not met. The High Court did not adjudicate the substantial questions of law framed at admission, left them open, and granted liberty to seek restoration if the tax effect is later shown to exceed the prescribed limit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2022 20:32:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1364 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301922</link>
      <description>An appeal was dismissed for low tax effect because the Revenue conceded that the monetary threshold under CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 was not met. The High Court did not adjudicate the substantial questions of law framed at admission, left them open, and granted liberty to seek restoration if the tax effect is later shown to exceed the prescribed limit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>