https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301908 Article 62 of the Limitation Act applies only where the defendant receives money for the plaintiff's use; where the payment is made to the defendant as money due to him and the claim is only an equitable claim to a share, Article 62 does not govern. The suit therefore fell under the residuary limitation article and was within time. As to revision under Section 115 CPC, the court treated it as unnecessary to decide the full scope of revisional jurisdiction because, even if maintainable, no interference was called for where the limitation ruling was correct in law. The revision application failed and the plaintiff's suit was held not barred by limitation. en-us Tue, 08 Jul 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Apr 2022 16:05:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301908 Article 62 of the Limitation Act applies only where the defendant receives money for the plaintiff's use; where the payment is made to the defendant as money due to him and the claim is only an equitable claim to a share, Article 62 does not govern. The suit therefore fell under the residuary limitation article and was within time. As to revision under Section 115 CPC, the court treated it as unnecessary to decide the full scope of revisional jurisdiction because, even if maintainable, no interference was called for where the limitation ruling was correct in law. The revision application failed and the plaintiff's suit was held not barred by limitation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Jul 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301908