https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301907 A suit to recover house tax wrongfully collected by a municipality was treated as an equitable claim for money had and received, so limitation fell under Article 62 of the Limitation Act rather than Article 96. The Court held that the later discovery of any mistake did not change the applicability of Article 62 on these pleadings and on the nature of the claim. On that basis, Article 96 was held inapplicable, the revision succeeded, the trial court decree was set aside, and the suit for recovery of the tax amount was dismissed. en-us Thu, 30 Oct 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Apr 2022 15:52:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301907 A suit to recover house tax wrongfully collected by a municipality was treated as an equitable claim for money had and received, so limitation fell under Article 62 of the Limitation Act rather than Article 96. The Court held that the later discovery of any mistake did not change the applicability of Article 62 on these pleadings and on the nature of the claim. On that basis, Article 96 was held inapplicable, the revision succeeded, the trial court decree was set aside, and the suit for recovery of the tax amount was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 30 Oct 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301907