<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1156 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421490</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order under challenge. It held that the denial of Cenvat Credit on various grounds was incorrect and that the extended period of limitation was wrongly invoked. The appellant was deemed entitled to the credit, and the penalty imposed was unjustified. The appeal was allowed, with the order pronounced in open court on 25-04-2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 21:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1156 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421490</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order under challenge. It held that the denial of Cenvat Credit on various grounds was incorrect and that the extended period of limitation was wrongly invoked. The appellant was deemed entitled to the credit, and the penalty imposed was unjustified. The appeal was allowed, with the order pronounced in open court on 25-04-2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>