<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1154 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421488</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the petitioner, a registered dealer under the Telangana Value Added Tax Act, to deposit a further 12 1/2 % of the disputed tax within 30 days for stay of coercive recovery steps. The Court emphasized the discretionary nature of granting stays in tax matters and the need to balance the interests of both parties. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs, and pending miscellaneous applications were to be closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1154 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421488</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the petitioner, a registered dealer under the Telangana Value Added Tax Act, to deposit a further 12 1/2 % of the disputed tax within 30 days for stay of coercive recovery steps. The Court emphasized the discretionary nature of granting stays in tax matters and the need to balance the interests of both parties. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs, and pending miscellaneous applications were to be closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>