<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1337 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301895</link>
    <description>An appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is treated as a first appeal, so the High Court must independently examine the entire evidence, address all points for determination, and give reasons supported by findings. Order XLI Rule 31 and Order XX Rule 4(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 require a reasoned judgment showing application of mind. A cryptic disposal that only discusses contributory negligence in summary form does not meet the duty of a first appellate court. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and remanded the first appeal for fresh decision on merits in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 20:44:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1337 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301895</link>
      <description>An appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is treated as a first appeal, so the High Court must independently examine the entire evidence, address all points for determination, and give reasons supported by findings. Order XLI Rule 31 and Order XX Rule 4(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 require a reasoned judgment showing application of mind. A cryptic disposal that only discusses contributory negligence in summary form does not meet the duty of a first appellate court. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and remanded the first appeal for fresh decision on merits in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>