<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 700 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301883</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment in a case involving a suit for permanent injunction due to insufficient findings on possession and title. The matter was remitted back to the High Court for fresh consideration, emphasizing the need for thorough examination in first appeals. The Supreme Court directed the High Court to expedite the appeal process, considering its age since 1990. The interim stay granted by the High Court was to continue until final disposal, with the option for modification upon request. Additionally, both Interlocutory Applications were dismissed as irrelevant following the appeal&#039;s remittal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2022 09:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 700 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301883</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment in a case involving a suit for permanent injunction due to insufficient findings on possession and title. The matter was remitted back to the High Court for fresh consideration, emphasizing the need for thorough examination in first appeals. The Supreme Court directed the High Court to expedite the appeal process, considering its age since 1990. The interim stay granted by the High Court was to continue until final disposal, with the option for modification upon request. Additionally, both Interlocutory Applications were dismissed as irrelevant following the appeal&#039;s remittal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>