<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1204 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301882</link>
    <description>The appellate court upheld the lower courts&#039; findings of guilt against the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that the necessary ingredients for the offense were proven, including the issuance of a cheque, its return by the bank, and failure to make payment despite demand. The evidence, including witness testimony and exhibits, supported the conviction, and the petitioner&#039;s defense was deemed improbable. The petition was dismissed, granting time for fine payment, with a warning of custodial sentence if not complied with, and release of the deposited amount to the complainant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 16:52:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1204 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301882</link>
      <description>The appellate court upheld the lower courts&#039; findings of guilt against the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that the necessary ingredients for the offense were proven, including the issuance of a cheque, its return by the bank, and failure to make payment despite demand. The evidence, including witness testimony and exhibits, supported the conviction, and the petitioner&#039;s defense was deemed improbable. The petition was dismissed, granting time for fine payment, with a warning of custodial sentence if not complied with, and release of the deposited amount to the complainant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>