<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 900 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301881</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that there was no impediment to permitting withdrawal of the appeals where the appellants sought unconditional withdrawal. Treating the request as abandonment of the appeals before the High Court, the Court found the High Court&#039;s refusal to allow withdrawal unsustainable. Exercising supervisory power, the Supreme Court set aside the impugned order, permitted withdrawal, and dismissed the appeals as withdrawn.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 16:13:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 900 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301881</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that there was no impediment to permitting withdrawal of the appeals where the appellants sought unconditional withdrawal. Treating the request as abandonment of the appeals before the High Court, the Court found the High Court&#039;s refusal to allow withdrawal unsustainable. Exercising supervisory power, the Supreme Court set aside the impugned order, permitted withdrawal, and dismissed the appeals as withdrawn.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>