<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 1012 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301880</link>
    <description>Statutory recruitment rules governed primary teacher appointments under the West Bengal Primary Education Act, 1973 and the 1991 Rules, so trained but unsuccessful candidates had no enforceable right to appointment dehors the prescribed selection procedure. Earlier Supreme Court directions were held inapplicable because they arose from a different factual and statutory framework and could not displace the later rules. Article 14 also could not be invoked for parity with candidates not similarly situated. The stated principle is that courts cannot order appointments in breach of mandatory recruitment rules, and equality claims cannot bypass a materially different legal regime.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 16:03:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 1012 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301880</link>
      <description>Statutory recruitment rules governed primary teacher appointments under the West Bengal Primary Education Act, 1973 and the 1991 Rules, so trained but unsuccessful candidates had no enforceable right to appointment dehors the prescribed selection procedure. Earlier Supreme Court directions were held inapplicable because they arose from a different factual and statutory framework and could not displace the later rules. Article 14 also could not be invoked for parity with candidates not similarly situated. The stated principle is that courts cannot order appointments in breach of mandatory recruitment rules, and equality claims cannot bypass a materially different legal regime.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>