<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1192 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301879</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Appellant Bank, setting aside the High Court&#039;s order for a fresh recording of evidence in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court directed the proceedings to continue from the current stage, rejecting the Respondents&#039; plea to add another party to the complaint. The decision emphasized the complainant&#039;s discretion in selecting parties for the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 15:54:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1192 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301879</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Appellant Bank, setting aside the High Court&#039;s order for a fresh recording of evidence in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court directed the proceedings to continue from the current stage, rejecting the Respondents&#039; plea to add another party to the complaint. The decision emphasized the complainant&#039;s discretion in selecting parties for the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>