<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 414 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301874</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, canceled penalties under section 271(1)(c) for excess depreciation claimed, upheld the deletion of penalty for an excess claim of deduction under section 80-IB, and dismissed the cross objection regarding penalty for deduction claimed under section 80-IA. The cancellation of penalties was based on specific circumstances and legal precedents cited in each case, with the Tribunal granting the department the option to re-initiate penalties if required during assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 11:04:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 414 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301874</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, canceled penalties under section 271(1)(c) for excess depreciation claimed, upheld the deletion of penalty for an excess claim of deduction under section 80-IB, and dismissed the cross objection regarding penalty for deduction claimed under section 80-IA. The cancellation of penalties was based on specific circumstances and legal precedents cited in each case, with the Tribunal granting the department the option to re-initiate penalties if required during assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>