<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1899 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301863</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions on issues regarding addition towards purchase of movies and deferred revenue expenditure. However, the Tribunal sustained the disallowance made under section 14A read with Rule 8D concerning investments in the subsidiary for control purposes. The order was pronounced on November 20, 2018, in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 08:19:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1899 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301863</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions on issues regarding addition towards purchase of movies and deferred revenue expenditure. However, the Tribunal sustained the disallowance made under section 14A read with Rule 8D concerning investments in the subsidiary for control purposes. The order was pronounced on November 20, 2018, in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>