<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1319 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301868</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, ruling that assessments cannot be reopened without fresh incriminating material, allowing business and preliminary expenses, and treating interest income as business income. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were partly allowed, with preliminary expenses limited to Rs. 14,87,380. The Tribunal applied the same reasoning for other assessment years, dismissing or partly allowing grounds related to business expenditure and preliminary expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 08:19:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1319 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301868</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, ruling that assessments cannot be reopened without fresh incriminating material, allowing business and preliminary expenses, and treating interest income as business income. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were partly allowed, with preliminary expenses limited to Rs. 14,87,380. The Tribunal applied the same reasoning for other assessment years, dismissing or partly allowing grounds related to business expenditure and preliminary expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>