<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1141 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMILNADU</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421475</link>
    <description>The AAR Tamil Nadu ruled that input tax credit on steel, cement and other consumables used in works contract services for construction of an integrated factory building is not available to the applicant. The court found that the applicant procured composite works contract services under SAC 9954 rather than purchasing materials directly. The incremental foundations constructed were not foundations for fixing plant and machinery to earth as contemplated under Section 17 explanation of GST Act. The applicant failed to establish individual procurement of materials or provide invoices in their name. No ruling was provided on pre-cast structures and capital goods due to insufficient documentary evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 16:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1141 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMILNADU</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421475</link>
      <description>The AAR Tamil Nadu ruled that input tax credit on steel, cement and other consumables used in works contract services for construction of an integrated factory building is not available to the applicant. The court found that the applicant procured composite works contract services under SAC 9954 rather than purchasing materials directly. The incremental foundations constructed were not foundations for fixing plant and machinery to earth as contemplated under Section 17 explanation of GST Act. The applicant failed to establish individual procurement of materials or provide invoices in their name. No ruling was provided on pre-cast structures and capital goods due to insufficient documentary evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>