<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (5) TMI 30 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28705</link>
    <description>The court held that Section 144B did not apply as the variation in the petitioner&#039;s total income did not exceed Rs. 1 lakh. Consequently, the petitioner&#039;s application failed, and the rule was discharged without costs. The court clarified it did not adjudicate other contentions in the pending appeal and stayed the operation of the order for six weeks upon the petitioner&#039;s request.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:28:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (5) TMI 30 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28705</link>
      <description>The court held that Section 144B did not apply as the variation in the petitioner&#039;s total income did not exceed Rs. 1 lakh. Consequently, the petitioner&#039;s application failed, and the rule was discharged without costs. The court clarified it did not adjudicate other contentions in the pending appeal and stayed the operation of the order for six weeks upon the petitioner&#039;s request.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>