https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421468 AAR Tamil Nadu held that an advance ruling application regarding GST classification and rate for job work services in manufacturing coconut oil, coconut de-oiled cake, rice bran oil, and de-oiled rice bran could not be admitted. The application sought clarification on whether services were taxable at 5% under specific notifications. However, since state authorities had already initiated investigations on the same taxability issues and departmental appeals were pending on identical questions, the application was rejected under Section 98(2) of CGST Act 2017, which prohibits admission of applications where questions are already pending or decided in proceedings involving the same applicant. en-us Tue, 22 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Apr 2025 17:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421468 AAR Tamil Nadu held that an advance ruling application regarding GST classification and rate for job work services in manufacturing coconut oil, coconut de-oiled cake, rice bran oil, and de-oiled rice bran could not be admitted. The application sought clarification on whether services were taxable at 5% under specific notifications. However, since state authorities had already initiated investigations on the same taxability issues and departmental appeals were pending on identical questions, the application was rejected under Section 98(2) of CGST Act 2017, which prohibits admission of applications where questions are already pending or decided in proceedings involving the same applicant. Case-Laws GST Tue, 22 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421468