<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1119 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421453</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant and directing the deletion of the notional interest addition. The decision emphasized the importance of assessing real income and the applicability of commercial expediency in business decisions. The Tribunal found that the non-charging of interest to the borrower was justified by commercial expediency and mutual understanding due to financial difficulties faced by the borrower, in line with relevant legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 08:18:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1119 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421453</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant and directing the deletion of the notional interest addition. The decision emphasized the importance of assessing real income and the applicability of commercial expediency in business decisions. The Tribunal found that the non-charging of interest to the borrower was justified by commercial expediency and mutual understanding due to financial difficulties faced by the borrower, in line with relevant legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>