https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421450 The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee on all three issues. It allowed the claim of bad debts written off under section 36(1)(vii) of the Act, directed deletion of the addition of unaccounted receipts, and reduced the disallowance of sundry expenses. The ITAT found that the assessee provided sufficient evidence for the bad debts and that the additions made by the AO were not justified, ultimately setting aside the CIT(A) order. en-us Mon, 24 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Apr 2022 08:18:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421450 The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee on all three issues. It allowed the claim of bad debts written off under section 36(1)(vii) of the Act, directed deletion of the addition of unaccounted receipts, and reduced the disallowance of sundry expenses. The ITAT found that the assessee provided sufficient evidence for the bad debts and that the additions made by the AO were not justified, ultimately setting aside the CIT(A) order. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 24 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421450