https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421448 The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for de novo adjudication, granting the appellant an opportunity to contest the issues with additional evidence. Procedural fairness was emphasized, and the authority was instructed to complete the process within three months, ensuring a comprehensive review of the evidence and a fair resolution of the misdeclaration of goods, classification of imported fabrics, demand for differential customs duty, and imposition of penalties. en-us Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Apr 2022 08:18:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421448 The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for de novo adjudication, granting the appellant an opportunity to contest the issues with additional evidence. Procedural fairness was emphasized, and the authority was instructed to complete the process within three months, ensuring a comprehensive review of the evidence and a fair resolution of the misdeclaration of goods, classification of imported fabrics, demand for differential customs duty, and imposition of penalties. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421448