<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (7) TMI 123 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301859</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the revision application, overturning the trial court&#039;s decision that deemed the Shah Jog Hundi inadmissible due to inadequate stamping. The court held that the Hundi, although not meeting the criteria of a bill of exchange under the Negotiable Instruments Act, qualified as a bill of exchange payable on demand under the Stamp Act. The court emphasized the extended definitions of a bill of exchange under the Stamp Act and concluded that the Hundi was exempt from duty under the Stamp Act, making it admissible in evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2022 11:10:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (7) TMI 123 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301859</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the revision application, overturning the trial court&#039;s decision that deemed the Shah Jog Hundi inadmissible due to inadequate stamping. The court held that the Hundi, although not meeting the criteria of a bill of exchange under the Negotiable Instruments Act, qualified as a bill of exchange payable on demand under the Stamp Act. The court emphasized the extended definitions of a bill of exchange under the Stamp Act and concluded that the Hundi was exempt from duty under the Stamp Act, making it admissible in evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>