<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (3) TMI 270 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301858</link>
    <description>The court determined that the hundis in question are considered &quot;bills of exchange payable on demand&quot; under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. The trial court&#039;s decision that the hundis are not chargeable with duty was upheld. The court emphasized the broad definition of &quot;bills of exchange payable on demand&quot; under the Act, encompassing various payment conditions beyond immediate demand. Relevant case law was crucial in the court&#039;s decision, highlighting the importance of accurate application of the Stamp Act&#039;s definitions in determining duty chargeability. The petitions for revision were dismissed, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2022 11:03:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (3) TMI 270 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301858</link>
      <description>The court determined that the hundis in question are considered &quot;bills of exchange payable on demand&quot; under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. The trial court&#039;s decision that the hundis are not chargeable with duty was upheld. The court emphasized the broad definition of &quot;bills of exchange payable on demand&quot; under the Act, encompassing various payment conditions beyond immediate demand. Relevant case law was crucial in the court&#039;s decision, highlighting the importance of accurate application of the Stamp Act&#039;s definitions in determining duty chargeability. The petitions for revision were dismissed, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>