https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301857 The court affirmed that the instruments in question are promissory notes as they contain an unconditional promise to pay a certain sum of money. It was held that the instruments did not require additional stamping for admissibility in evidence since they were executed outside India and the promisee had brought the suits without endorsing or negotiating the instruments. The civil revision petitions were dismissed, and the petitioner was ordered to bear the costs. en-us Mon, 02 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Apr 2022 10:55:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301857 The court affirmed that the instruments in question are promissory notes as they contain an unconditional promise to pay a certain sum of money. It was held that the instruments did not require additional stamping for admissibility in evidence since they were executed outside India and the promisee had brought the suits without endorsing or negotiating the instruments. The civil revision petitions were dismissed, and the petitioner was ordered to bear the costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 02 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301857