<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1059 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421393</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the reassessment order and the CIT(A)&#039;s decision upholding the addition of Rs. 25 lakhs to the Assessee&#039;s income. The Tribunal held that the reopening of the case under sections 147/148 was invalid as the AO failed to independently verify the information and relied on borrowed satisfaction. Consequently, the Tribunal did not address the merits of the addition, ultimately ruling in favor of the Assessee on 23/03/2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2022 08:34:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1059 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421393</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the reassessment order and the CIT(A)&#039;s decision upholding the addition of Rs. 25 lakhs to the Assessee&#039;s income. The Tribunal held that the reopening of the case under sections 147/148 was invalid as the AO failed to independently verify the information and relied on borrowed satisfaction. Consequently, the Tribunal did not address the merits of the addition, ultimately ruling in favor of the Assessee on 23/03/2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>