<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (8) TMI 9 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28693</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed on partners under section 271(1)(a) for late filing of returns, reasoning that the partners&#039; default was linked to the firm&#039;s default, which had already been penalized. The court emphasized the discretionary power under section 271 to impose penalties and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating that separate penalties on partners and firms are permissible but not mandatory. The court found the Tribunal&#039;s exercise of discretion justified in this case, concluding that the cancellation of the partners&#039; penalty was lawful. No costs were awarded in this judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:39:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (8) TMI 9 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28693</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed on partners under section 271(1)(a) for late filing of returns, reasoning that the partners&#039; default was linked to the firm&#039;s default, which had already been penalized. The court emphasized the discretionary power under section 271 to impose penalties and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating that separate penalties on partners and firms are permissible but not mandatory. The court found the Tribunal&#039;s exercise of discretion justified in this case, concluding that the cancellation of the partners&#039; penalty was lawful. No costs were awarded in this judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>