<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1054 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421388</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The profits from the sale of land parcels were classified under &#039;capital gains&#039; instead of &#039;business income&#039;. The Tribunal emphasized the long holding period, absence of trading activities, and use of own funds as factors supporting the capital investment nature of the transactions. The judgment was pronounced on 15/11/2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2022 03:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1054 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421388</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The profits from the sale of land parcels were classified under &#039;capital gains&#039; instead of &#039;business income&#039;. The Tribunal emphasized the long holding period, absence of trading activities, and use of own funds as factors supporting the capital investment nature of the transactions. The judgment was pronounced on 15/11/2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>