https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421383 The Court held that the order dated 4th June 2021 was an order in personam, benefiting only the petitioners in that specific case. However, recognizing the need for a consolidated order in anti-dumping investigations, the Court allowed the exporters (petitioners) to file responses until 21st July 2021, considering the extension granted to importers. The respondents were directed to accept the petitioners' responses upon payment of costs to the Armed Forces Battle Casualties Welfare Fund. This decision was made based on the unique circumstances of the case. en-us Tue, 19 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Feb 2023 16:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421383 The Court held that the order dated 4th June 2021 was an order in personam, benefiting only the petitioners in that specific case. However, recognizing the need for a consolidated order in anti-dumping investigations, the Court allowed the exporters (petitioners) to file responses until 21st July 2021, considering the extension granted to importers. The respondents were directed to accept the petitioners' responses upon payment of costs to the Armed Forces Battle Casualties Welfare Fund. This decision was made based on the unique circumstances of the case. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 19 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421383