https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421382 The court directed the respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and conduct a personal hearing for the petitioner's authorized representative. The respondents were instructed to pass a speaking order addressing the relief sought by the petitioner within eight weeks from the date of the court order. The judgment concluded by disposing of the writ petition in the terms outlined, emphasizing compliance with the digitally signed copy of the order for all involved parties. en-us Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Apr 2022 08:33:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421382 The court directed the respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and conduct a personal hearing for the petitioner's authorized representative. The respondents were instructed to pass a speaking order addressing the relief sought by the petitioner within eight weeks from the date of the court order. The judgment concluded by disposing of the writ petition in the terms outlined, emphasizing compliance with the digitally signed copy of the order for all involved parties. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421382