https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421377 The application for release based on the alleged illegality of detention post-filing of the complaint was dismissed. The Court upheld the validity of remand orders under Section 309(2) Cr.P.C. even before cognizance was taken, citing Supreme Court precedents. Emphasizing the need for expedited cognizance, the Court directed the trial court to promptly address the issue while highlighting the importance of maintaining custody continuity. en-us Tue, 19 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Apr 2022 08:33:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421377 The application for release based on the alleged illegality of detention post-filing of the complaint was dismissed. The Court upheld the validity of remand orders under Section 309(2) Cr.P.C. even before cognizance was taken, citing Supreme Court precedents. Emphasizing the need for expedited cognizance, the Court directed the trial court to promptly address the issue while highlighting the importance of maintaining custody continuity. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 19 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421377