<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rejects Winding Up Petition u/ss 433(e) and (f) of Companies Act; Defenses Not Bona Fide.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63054</link>
    <description>Admissibility of Winding up petition filed invoking Sections 433 (e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956 - appointment of the Official Liquidator - The admission of the winding up petition is not automatic. If the debt is bonafidely disputed and the defence is a substantial one, the Court will not wind up the company. Therefore, before admitting such a petition, it needs to be ascertained by the Company Court, what defence the Company has taken and whether the said defence can be said to be bonafide - Both the defences raised by the appellant are rejected. At least, they are not accepted as bonafide defence. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2022 08:33:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2022 08:33:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rejects Winding Up Petition u/ss 433(e) and (f) of Companies Act; Defenses Not Bona Fide.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63054</link>
      <description>Admissibility of Winding up petition filed invoking Sections 433 (e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956 - appointment of the Official Liquidator - The admission of the winding up petition is not automatic. If the debt is bonafidely disputed and the defence is a substantial one, the Court will not wind up the company. Therefore, before admitting such a petition, it needs to be ascertained by the Company Court, what defence the Company has taken and whether the said defence can be said to be bonafide - Both the defences raised by the appellant are rejected. At least, they are not accepted as bonafide defence. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2022 08:33:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>