https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421376 The court upheld the admission of the winding-up petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956, as the debt was found not to be bonafidely disputed. The appointment of the Official Liquidator as Provisional Liquidator was justified due to the respondent's failure to pay admitted dues. The court dismissed the appeals, affirming the Company Court's orders and extending the stay until 28.01.2022 for a potential challenge. en-us Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Apr 2022 08:33:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421376 The court upheld the admission of the winding-up petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956, as the debt was found not to be bonafidely disputed. The appointment of the Official Liquidator as Provisional Liquidator was justified due to the respondent's failure to pay admitted dues. The court dismissed the appeals, affirming the Company Court's orders and extending the stay until 28.01.2022 for a potential challenge. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421376