https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421365 Review jurisdiction under Section 114 read with Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is limited to discovery of new matter, mistake, or an error apparent on the face of the record. A later co-ordinate Bench decision taking a different view does not, by itself, justify review or reopen a concluded judgment. The court held that the applicants were seeking rehearing on the basis of a subsequent judgment rather than identifying any patent or self-evident error in the order under review, so the review petition was not maintainable on that ground. en-us Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Apr 2022 18:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421365 Review jurisdiction under Section 114 read with Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is limited to discovery of new matter, mistake, or an error apparent on the face of the record. A later co-ordinate Bench decision taking a different view does not, by itself, justify review or reopen a concluded judgment. The court held that the applicants were seeking rehearing on the basis of a subsequent judgment rather than identifying any patent or self-evident error in the order under review, so the review petition was not maintainable on that ground. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421365