<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1031 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421365</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the review petition seeking reconsideration of the order directing notional promotion for respondents, as the petitioners failed to demonstrate any error apparent on the face of the record. The Court emphasized that a review cannot be used to challenge subsequent changes in law or judgments by other benches. The review was deemed devoid of merits, and no costs were awarded, reaffirming the limited scope of the review process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 18:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1031 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421365</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the review petition seeking reconsideration of the order directing notional promotion for respondents, as the petitioners failed to demonstrate any error apparent on the face of the record. The Court emphasized that a review cannot be used to challenge subsequent changes in law or judgments by other benches. The review was deemed devoid of merits, and no costs were awarded, reaffirming the limited scope of the review process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>